Skip to main content

Example Job Description

Data Steward

A domain specialist who protects the meaning, quality, appropriate use, and continuity of critical district data by connecting business processes with governance and technical teams.

Classified
Download this job descriptionEditable Microsoft Word format based on the SDLA Professional template.
Download DOCX

Interview Planning Resource

Possible Interview Q&A: Data Steward

How to use this resource: Select questions that measure competencies established through the district’s current job analysis. Ask candidates the same predetermined questions under comparable conditions and evaluate responses against the same job-related criteria.

The indicators below describe evidence a strong response may contain; they are not required scripts or the only acceptable answers.

  1. How would you establish priorities and a practical annual work plan for source applications, business processes, definitions, validation reports, metadata, access, issue, and governance workflows for assigned domains?

    Strong response indicators: Connects district goals and user needs to risk, dependencies, capacity, owners, milestones, service measures, communication, and review rather than producing an unranked project list.

  2. Describe a time you found that a familiar process or report was producing unreliable results. How did you investigate and correct it?

    Strong response indicators: Defines the expected result, traces evidence to authoritative sources, distinguishes symptoms from root causes, involves accountable owners, tests the correction, reconciles downstream effects, documents decisions, and monitors recurrence.

  3. You encounter a recurring quality issue caused by unclear ownership or an upstream business process. What would you do first, and how would you manage the issue through resolution?

    Strong response indicators: Protects people and continuity, establishes scope and authority, preserves evidence, engages the right owners, communicates proportionately, documents decisions, verifies recovery or correction, and completes a lessons-learned review.

  4. How would you work with data owners, program teams, school staff, system administrators, analysts, privacy, security, governance, and downstream users when they disagree about priorities or the acceptable level of risk?

    Strong response indicators: Clarifies decision rights and shared purpose, surfaces evidence and constraints, distinguishes requirements from preferences, documents options and residual risk, facilitates a timely decision, and escalates through established authority when needed.

  5. What controls would you put in place before making a significant change to source applications, business processes, definitions, validation reports, metadata, access, issue, and governance workflows for assigned domains?

    Strong response indicators: Includes requirements, ownership, risk and privacy review, representative testing, accessibility where relevant, approvals, change communication, rollback or contingency, validation, monitoring, documentation, and support readiness.

  6. How would you decide what to automate and what should retain meaningful human review?

    Strong response indicators: Selects stable, repeatable, testable work for automation; preserves human authority for exceptions and consequential judgments; addresses access, logging, bias or error, monitoring, failure recovery, documentation, and periodic reassessment.

  7. How would you explain a serious technical, instructional, operational, or data concern to a leader who does not work in your specialty?

    Strong response indicators: States the affected people and services, evidence, uncertainty, consequence, deadline, accountable owners, options, recommendation, residual risk, and next update in plain language.

  8. What would you do when a request exceeds data-owner authority, technical administration, privacy and security approval, records decisions, program policy, and final governance decisions?

    Strong response indicators: Recognizes the limit, avoids unauthorized action, clarifies the legitimate need, preserves service where possible, routes the decision to the authorized owner, documents the handoff, and follows through without abandoning the requester.

  9. How would you protect confidential information while still providing useful service and appropriate access?

    Strong response indicators: Applies purpose limitation, minimum necessary access, role-based permissions, secure transmission and storage, approved retention, understandable communication, auditability, timely removal, and incident escalation.

  10. How would you build staff capability so your office does not become the permanent fixer of every problem?

    Strong response indicators: Uses clear ownership, role-based training, usable procedures, coaching, feedback loops, office hours, communities of practice, quality reports, cross-training, and measures whether source practices improve.

  11. What evidence would you use to determine whether your work is improving definition completeness, quality, timeliness, issue resolution, source correction, access review, documentation, adoption, and continuity?

    Strong response indicators: Uses a balanced set of outcome, implementation, service, risk, equity, and user-experience measures; disaggregates appropriately; explains limitations; establishes baselines and review cadence; and changes course when evidence warrants.

  12. What would you prioritize during your first 90 days?

    Strong response indicators: Would learn the assigned domain and authoritative processes, meet owners and users, inventory definitions and recurring issues, confirm access and reports, and resolve one high-value quality or documentation gap; listens before redesigning, identifies urgent risks, delivers credible early improvements, and creates an achievable longer-term roadmap with owners and measures.

Position Description

Under the direction of the appropriate district administrator, the Data Steward serves as the designated operational steward for assigned data domains, definitions, quality rules, issues, access conditions, metadata, and lifecycle practices.

The position connects policy, people, process, information, and technology; establishes repeatable practices; makes unresolved risk visible; and supports continuous improvement without displacing the authority of designated program, legal, privacy, security, fiscal, instructional, or executive decision-makers.

Reports To

Illustrative reporting relationship: Program manager, data governance manager, chief data officer, information systems manager, or other designated data owner. Insert the school district’s approved reporting relationship here.

Required Education and Credentials

Required

  • Associate degree or equivalent college coursework in education, business, information systems, data management, public administration, or a field related to the assigned domain.
  • No specific credential is universally required; relevant program, data governance, privacy, records, analytics, or systems training is preferred.
  • Successful completion of all district-required employment clearances and assigned privacy, security, accessibility, records, and safety training.

Preferred

  • Graduate study, advanced coursework, or current professional learning directly related to the position’s assigned scope.
  • Relevant training in project management, facilitation, change management, data-informed improvement, and public-sector service.

Required / Desired Experience

Required Experience

  • Experience working with the assigned business domain, records, data entry, reporting, quality review, procedures, or information systems.
  • Experience coordinating deadline-driven work with multiple departments, users, or school sites.
  • Experience handling confidential information and documenting decisions, exceptions, and completed work.

Desired Experience

  • Experience with data dictionaries, metadata, validation rules, issue management, access review, lineage, governance councils, SQL or reporting tools, and cross-functional facilitation.
  • Experience developing procedures, training users, improving processes, and supporting continuity during staff or system changes.

Essential Duties and Responsibilities

Domain Definitions and Metadata

  • Maintain approved definitions, business rules, code meanings, authoritative sources, owners, users, lineage, and metadata for assigned elements.
  • Document how policy and operational changes affect forms, entry, systems, integrations, reports, access, and retention.
  • Present unresolved definition or ownership questions through established governance channels.

Data Quality and Issue Resolution

  • Define validation rules, thresholds, review calendars, exception reports, and quality expectations tied to fitness for purpose.
  • Investigate missing, duplicate, inconsistent, late, or inaccurately coded records and coordinate root-cause correction.
  • Track issues, owners, decisions, remediation, verification, recurrence, and broader process-improvement opportunities.

Access, Use, and Lifecycle Support

  • Support access and sharing reviews by documenting purpose, minimum necessary data, user role, conditions, retention, and review dates.
  • Coordinate with privacy, security, records, research, and program authorities; do not independently approve matters outside delegated authority.
  • Review reports and data products for approved definitions, appropriate caveats, suppression, and responsible interpretation.

Training, Governance, and Continuity

  • Train data creators and users on definitions, entry, validation, correction, confidentiality, and escalation.
  • Participate in governance councils, system changes, testing, reporting cycles, audits, and improvement projects affecting the domain.
  • Maintain procedures, calendars, decision logs, cross-training, and continuity materials; perform other related duties consistent with classification.

Required Skills and Abilities

Knowledge of

  • Assigned program processes, policies, calendars, records, data elements, source systems, reports, users, and downstream dependencies
  • Data ownership, stewardship, metadata, definitions, quality dimensions, validation, lineage, access, sharing, retention, and issue management
  • Student and employee privacy, security, records, minimum necessary use, appropriate disclosure, and audit-ready documentation
  • Basic data analysis, spreadsheets, reports, ticketing, process mapping, facilitation, training, and continuous improvement

Ability to

  • Explain how data is created, changed, approved, used, corrected, and transmitted in the assigned domain
  • Define terms and quality rules in language understood by program and technical teams
  • Investigate issues using record-level evidence while protecting confidentiality
  • Coordinate correction at the authoritative source and verify downstream results
  • Facilitate practical decisions and escalate unresolved ownership, policy, access, or risk questions
  • Maintain clear documentation and train staff without becoming the permanent fixer of every error

Work Environment

  • Work is performed primarily in district offices, schools, meeting rooms, training environments, and other computer-based professional settings, with remote participation as authorized.
  • The position requires extended computer use and detailed review of records, systems, reports, procedures, communications, or technical documentation.
  • Work involves frequent coordination with data owners, program teams, school staff, system administrators, analysts, privacy, security, governance, and downstream users.
  • The employee may encounter competing priorities, interruptions, confidential matters, fixed deadlines, and time-sensitive problems requiring calm, documented judgment.
  • Workload may increase during school opening and closing, reporting cycles, audits, major changes, incidents, and other critical district operations.

Other Requirements

  • Successfully complete required criminal-record, fingerprint, and employment clearances.
  • Complete a tuberculosis risk assessment and any examination required by applicable law or district policy.
  • Complete district-required cybersecurity, privacy, accessibility, nondiscrimination, workplace-safety, and records-management training.
  • Maintain professional confidentiality and comply with district policies governing records, information security, acceptable technology use, conflicts of interest, and data access.
  • Travel between district offices, schools, meetings, training locations, and professional-development activities as assigned.
  • Possess a valid California driver’s license and maintain insurability when driving is an essential function of the position.
  • Occasionally work evening, weekend, or extended hours during critical operations, incidents, deadlines, public meetings, or system transitions.
  • Regularly sit, stand, walk, speak, hear, read, and operate computers and standard office equipment; occasionally lift, carry, or move records, equipment, or supplies weighing up to 25 pounds.
  • Perform the essential functions of the position with or without reasonable accommodation.