California Professional Standards for Education Leaders · Instructional leadership and professional learning
Establish coherent, research-based professional learning aligned with organizational vision and goals for educator and student growth.
Translate the indicator into observable adult practice, protected collaboration time, and evidence of changes in student learning.
Developing the practice
Coherent professional learning is not a calendar of workshops. It is a sustained improvement system that connects a student-learning priority to specific educator practices, repeated opportunities to learn and apply those practices, and evidence that the work is producing better experiences and outcomes for students.
Define the student-learning priority
Begin with a bounded problem or opportunity grounded in multiple forms of evidence. Describe which students are affected, what they currently experience, and what improved learning would look like.
- Review student work, assessment results, participation, attendance, classroom observation, and student or family perspective as appropriate.
- Avoid selecting a professional-development topic simply because it is popular, available, or already purchased.
Identify the educator practice that must develop
Work backward from the student priority to the knowledge, skill, belief, instructional move, collaborative routine, or leadership practice educators need to strengthen.
- Describe the practice in observable terms so educators can study, rehearse, and receive feedback on it.
- Clarify what should remain consistent and where professional judgment or adaptation is expected.
Establish a theory of action and success criteria
State why the proposed professional learning should influence educator practice and how that change should improve student learning. Make the assumptions visible before committing substantial time or money.
- Define early implementation indicators, changes expected in adult practice, and longer-term student evidence.
- Identify evidence that would cause the team to revise or abandon the approach.
Audit existing initiatives for coherence
Inventory current training, coaching, collaboration structures, curriculum work, required initiatives, and external-provider commitments. Determine whether they reinforce or compete with the priority.
- Stop, combine, postpone, or redesign activities that fragment attention without advancing the agreed practice.
- Check alignment among professional learning, curriculum, assessment, supervision, and school-improvement plans.
Design a sustained learning sequence
Provide repeated opportunities to understand the practice, see strong models, rehearse, apply it in authentic settings, examine evidence, receive feedback, and revise.
- Use workshops only as one component of a longer cycle that includes job-embedded learning.
- Plan the sequence, protected time, materials, facilitation, coaching, and follow-up before launch.
Differentiate support and clarify roles
Use educator experience, assignment, confidence, student context, and implementation evidence to vary the pathway without lowering the shared expectation.
- Specify responsibilities for administrators, coaches, teacher leaders, collaborative teams, and external partners.
- Distinguish confidential or nonevaluative coaching from formal supervision and evaluation.
Protect the conditions for implementation
Allocate time, staffing, technology, substitute coverage, facilitation, and access to expertise so educators can apply the learning. Anticipate operational barriers that can turn a sound design into an optional activity.
- Publish a manageable implementation rhythm and identify what participants will produce or examine at each point.
- Create a clear route for questions, technical assistance, and rapid resolution of barriers.
Study implementation, practice, and student effects
Review evidence at three levels: whether the learning opportunities occurred as designed, whether educator practice changed, and whether student experience or outcomes improved.
- Do not treat attendance, satisfaction, or course completion as sufficient evidence of impact.
- Return findings to participants and decide explicitly whether to sustain, adapt, expand, or stop the work.
Software connections for this indicator
Frontline Professional Growth
Connects professional-growth plans and learning activity to organizational priorities; the leader must still gather evidence that practice and student experience changed.
View the SDLA product page →Product references illustrate a leadership capability and do not constitute endorsement. Confirm current features, privacy, accessibility, integrations, contracts, and district fit.
Leader Resources
Data Wise, Third Edition
Kathryn Parker Boudett and Candice Bocala
The author’s framework can help a leadership team move from intention to disciplined practice in 2A1.
Learning Forward Standards for Professional Learning
Use the standards and role-specific action guides to examine the content, processes, and conditions required for a coherent professional-learning system.
Questions for reflection and mentoring
- Where do written expectations and lived practice diverge?
- What question is the team avoiding because the answer may require a difficult change?
- Which measure is informative here, and what can it not tell us?
- What evidence will be brought back to the community after action is taken?







































































